Pyrrhonism Past & Present

For what it's worth, my monograph has now been published:

Pyrrhonism Past and Present: Inquiry, Disagreement, Self-Knowledge, and Rationality (Cham: Springer, 2022).

More information can be found here.

Maimonides Lecture on Skepticism

The next Maimonides Lecture on Scepticism will take place on February 16th at 18:00 (Hamburg time). Ben Sommer (Jewish Theological Seminary, New York) will talk about “Intentional Ambiguity in the Pentateuch’s Revelation Narratives: Doubt as a Religious Value in the Lawgiving in Exodus.”  The lecture will be held online. You must register by sending an email to maimonides-centre@uni-hamburg.de.

Volume of MSP on Doubt

The latest volume of Midwest Studies in Philosophy (now edited by Yuval Avnur) is devoted to doubt. It contains 23 articles divided into four sections: (i) Historical Perspectives, (ii) Knowledge and Rational Belief, (iii) Social and Political Perspectives, and (iv) Inquiry, Success, and Language. The articles can be found here. 

Issue 12.1 of IJSS

The first issue of volume 12 (2022) of the International Journal for the Study of Skepticism has been published and can be found here. It is a special issue devoted to skepticism in India and edited by Ethan Mills and Matthew Dasti.

Maimonides Lecture on Skepticism

The next Maimonides Lecture on Skepticism will take place online on 10 January 2022, at 18:00 (local time). Dana Lloyd (Villanova University) will talk about “Religious Freedom and Land Rights: On Legal Language and Ethical Scepticism.” Complete information can be found here. For registration, send an email to maimonides-centre@uni-hamburg.de.

Call for Applications - Research Associate

There's a call for applications for a Research Associate at the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies (Universität Hamburg). Complete information can be found here. As far as I know, this is an excellent position, so if you can, go ahead and apply.

Issue 11.4 of IJSS

The fourth issue of volume 11 (2021) of the International Journal for the Study of Skepticism has been published and can be found here. It includes articles by Tim Black, Christopher Stratman, and Patrick Bondy.

CFA: Fellowships at MCAS

There's a call for applications for doctoral, postdoctoral, and senior fellowships for the academic year 2022-2023 at the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies (Universität Hamburg). This is an excellent opportunity for those interested in working on the topic “Limits of Faith, Limits of Scepticism.” For complete information, go here.

MCAS's Annual Lecture

The Annual Lecture of the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies (Universität Hamburg) will take place on 26 October 2021, at 18:00 (local time). Vivian Liska (Universiteit Antwerpen) will present the paper “Holy Doubts: Language Scepticism in German-Jewish Modernism.” You'll find complete information here.

Skepticism Lecture Series: Session IX

Session IX: Thursday, 21st October 2021, 12:00-13:30 Central Time Zone (United States and Canada) (= 11:00-12:30 Mountain Time Zone = 17:00-18:30 GMT). (Time Zones in North America take account of Daylight Saving Time.)

Speaker: John Pittard (Yale University)

Title: “How Should We Respond to Evidence of Boltzmann Brain Superabundance?”

Abstract: A “Boltzmann Brain” is a “brain” that forms by chance in an otherwise disordered region of space. Some leading cosmological models predict that in the future history of the universe, there are sure to be numerous Boltzmann Brains that pass through a sequence of physical states that mirror states of your own brain over the last several seconds. Plausibly, these Boltzmann Brains would have an episode of conscious experience that is phenomenally equivalent to your recent experience. In this paper, I assess the skeptical challenge posed by scientific support for Boltzmann Brain superabundance. I begin by critiquing a recent treatment of Boltzmann Brain skepticism by Dogramaci, explaining why his response has absurd implications and is not germane to the most formidable skeptical worry posed by predictions of Boltzmann Brains. I then consider other responses, including an argument articulated by Kotzen and Chalmers that says that the coherence of one’s present experience provides strong evidence against theories predicting Boltzmann Brains. While this argument has promise, it depends on controversial principles of “observation selection theory” that can be used to support dubious positions such as an anthropocentric theory of consciousness.

To join the meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88352861727

Information about past and upcoming sessions can be found here: https://skepticismnetwork.weebly.com/skepticism-lecture-series.html

Arcesilaus's Attack on Stoic Metaphysics

Those working on Academic skepticism might be interested in the following recent book:

Charles Snyder, Beyond Hellenistic Epistemology: Arcesilaus and the Destruction of Stoic Metaphysics. Bloomsbury Academic, 2021.

More information can be found here.

Issue 11.3 of IJSS

The third issue of volume 11 (2021) of the International Journal for the Study of Skepticism has been published and can be found here. It includes articles by François-Xavier de Peretti and Marin Geier, discussions by Ryan McCoy and Howard Sankey, and book reviews by Stéphane Marchand and Roger Clarke.

Brill Studies in Skepticism, Volume 4

The fourth volume of the book series Brill Studies in Skepticism is now out:

Brian Ribeiro, Sextus, Montaigne, Hume: Pyrrhonizers (Brill, 2021).

For more information, go here.

Skepticism Lecture Series: Session VIII

Session VIII: Thursday, 5th August 2021, 12:00-13:30 Central Time Zone (United States and Canada) (= 11:00-12:30 Mountain Time Zone = 17:00-18:30 GMT). (Time Zones in North America take account of Daylight Saving Time.)

Speaker: Michelle Woodland (Texas Tech University).

Title: “Vogel on Inference to the Best Explanation as a Response to Underdetermination Skepticism.”

Abstract: In this paper, I will defend what Jonathan Vogel refers to as ‘domestic skepticism’ against his claim of refutation. The type of skepticism at issue concerns itself with the explanation for sensory experience. The skeptic claims that sensory experience is underdetermined between the virtual and material worlds. However, Vogel argues that the material world is the best explanation for our sensory experience. He presupposes three assumptions for what he considers the best explanation, and argues that the material world satisfies these criteria better than any skeptical hypothesis. So, according to Vogel, the material world and the virtual world are not underdetermined and we have a reason to favor the material world hypothesis. I will attempt to argue that Vogel’s refutation against underdetermination skepticism does not succeed by specifically arguing against his simplicity criterion to show that underdetermination skepticism, at least in regards to the material and virtual world hypotheses, does not yet seem to be refuted.

To join the meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85822420317.