Monday, March 25, 2019

Skepticism and Social Epistemology

A workshop entitled “Skepticism and Social Epistemology” will take place at the Department of Philosophy at the University of Haifa on Monday, April ‎‎8, 2019.

Although skepticism is a central theme in epistemology, skepticism is rarely dealt with in ‎social epistemology. A rarely challenged assumption in the epistemology of testimony is ‎that subjects normally acquire knowledge and justified belief from the testimony of ‎others. However, even if we can gain knowledge from non-testimonial sources, such as ‎perception and inference, there might be special reasons why we cannot get knowledge or ‎justified belief from testimony. Our increasing reliance on technologically and ‎algorithmically mediated testimonies and phenomena such as fake news may also cast ‎doubts on our possibility of getting testimonial knowledge in general or specific cases. ‎The workshop talks address these issues. 

The speakers will be Arnon Keren, Aviv Barnoy, Boaz Miller, Bryan Frances, Maya Roman, Ori Freiman, and Sandy Goldberg. 

Attendance is is free of charge, but prior registration is required. You may see the program and register at http://philevents.org/event/show/71482 or you can register by sending an email to boaz.m@zefat.ac.il.

Thursday, March 14, 2019

Issue 9.1 of IJSS

Issue 9.1 of the International Journal for the Study of Skepticism has just been published. It contains articles by Ruth Weintraub, Ali Hossein Khani, Kevin McCain, and Nenad Popovic, as well as book reviews by Scott Aikin, Annalisa Coliva, Cameron Boult, and Gerhard Schurz. It can be accessed here.

Sunday, March 10, 2019

Ancient Skepticism Workshop in Paris

Stéphane Marchand has organized a one-day workshop on ancient skepticism (“Actualités du scepticisme ancien”) to be held on March 18, from 14h to 18h, at the Bibliothèque interuniversitaire de la Sorbonne (Salle de formation), 17, rue de la Sorbonne, Paris. If you want to attend, you should register by sending an email to philo-recherche@univ-paris1.fr. Here's the program:

Richard Bett (Johns Hopkins University): “The Modes in Sextus: Theory and Practice”.

Lorenzo Corti (Université de Lorraine): “Scepticisme, croyance et doute chez les Pyrrhoniens”.

Tuesday, March 5, 2019

Conference “Skeptical Anthropology”

The conference “Anthropologie sceptique et modernité will take place at the École Normale Supérieure de Lyon on March 13-15. For complete information, click here.

Thursday, February 28, 2019

Pyrrhonism Bibliography

My annotated bibliography on Pyrrhonism in Oxford Bibliographies in Philosophy, originally published in 2013, has just been updated.

Monday, February 25, 2019

Call for Papers

There's a call for papers on contemporary discussions of external world skepticism for Belgrade Philosophical Annual. For complete information, go here.

Tuesday, February 19, 2019

Call for Fellowship Applications

The Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies (MCAS) at Universität Hamburg invites early career researchers to apply for its junior fellowship programme for the academic year 2019–2020. For complete information about the topic, eligibility, and application procedure, click here.

Friday, February 15, 2019

Brill Studies in Skepticim, Vol. 2

The second volume of Brill Studies in Skepticism is now out:

Kevin McCain & Ted Poston (eds.), The Mystery of Skepticism: New Explorations (Brill, 2019).

Thursday, February 7, 2019

Brill Studies in Skepticim, Vol. 1

The first volume of Brill Studies in Skepticism has just been published:

Orazio Cappello, The School of Doubt: Skepticism, History and Politics in Cicero's Academica (Brill, 2019).

For more information, go here.

Wednesday, January 30, 2019

Moral Abolitionism

Due to personal issues, I haven't been able to post for a while. I resume posting with information about a new volume on moral abolitionism edited by Richard Garner and Richard Joyce: The End of Morality: Taking Moral Abolitionism Seriously (Routledge, 2019). For more on this volume, click here.

Tuesday, December 25, 2018

Third Yearbook of the MCAS

The 2018 Yearbook of the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies has just been published. The articles and reports can be found here.

Wednesday, December 19, 2018

Issue 8.4 of IJSS

Issue 8.4 of the International Journal for the Study of Skepticism  is now out. It features a symposium on Bart Streumer's Unbelievable Errors (OUP, 2017) -- with contributions by Frank Jackson, Philip Stratton-Lake, Mark Schroeder, and Streumer -- and book reviews by Stéphane Marchand and Peter Fosl. It can be accessed here.

Thursday, November 8, 2018

Believing Out of Need

A couple of days ago, I reread parts of Mark Rowlands's The Philosopher and the Wolf: Lessons from the Wild on Love, Death & Happiness (Granta, 2008). At one point, Rowlands writes: “I once had a colleague who was unusual among philosophers in that he was a believer. He always used to tell his students: when the shit hits the fan, you will believe. Maybe that's what happens. When the shit hits the fan, people look for God. When the shit hits the fan, I remember a little wolf cub”. Due to several unfortunate events that have occurred over the year, for the past few days I've been thinking about the issue of believing out of need (or desire or desperation). Over the years, I've heard or read the kind of remark made by Rowlands's former colleague; it is something most people say when confronted with someone professing, e.g., some form of radical skepticism. Even though I do understand the “logic” of such a stance, it appears to me that, in the end, it all comes down to each person's temperament. Once or twice in the course of my life, I felt the need to believe in something that is religious or metaphysical in nature, but after a few seconds, I told myself that as a matter of fact I didn't, the reason being that I couldn't hold religious or metaphysical beliefs simply because I needed to. Of course, this issue has to do with whether one can hold beliefs only on the basis of evidence of some sort or whether one can also hold beliefs out of need. In other words, do we always need epistemic reasons or are we also able to hold beliefs merely on the basis of pragmatic reasons? In my experience, it seems that quite a number of people can start believing in God, the afterlife, the soul, or what have you after having been confronted with extreme situations, but it is also clear that even when the shit hits the fan, some who would love to find solace in such beliefs are as a matter of fact unable to hold them -- for them pragmatic reasons are not enough. I'm considering the issue from a psychological point of view (is it psychologically possible for us to hold beliefs only because it is useful for us to do so?) and leaving aside the normative question of whether one should believe in x only on the basis of pragmatic reasons.

Monday, November 5, 2018

CFP for Special Issue of Theoria

There's a call for papers for a special issue of the Swedish journal Theoria devoted to medieval skepticism. Complete information below:

Guest Editor: Henrik Lagerlund (Stockholm University), henrik.lagerlund@philosophy.su.se.

Deadline for submissions: September 1, 2019

Description: The high point of scholarly debate on the history of skepticism was the 1970’s and the 1980’s. It was Ancient and Early Modern skepticism that was debated then, and some groundbreaking books and articles were produced as a result. After that intense debate the interest waned somewhat and the history of skepticism does not attract as much interest anymore. Scholarly debate on Medieval skepticism has never reached such a highpoint, in fact, there has been relatively little interest in skeptical debates and skepticism in the Middle Ages. By devoting a special issue of Theoria to Medieval skepticism, we hope to change this and interest a new generation of scholars in questions about the role skepticism and skeptical arguments played in the Middle Ages. In this context, we define Medieval philosophy broadly to include philosophy and philosophical theology between the time of Augustine and Francisco Suárez, that is, roughly between 400 and 1600 CE. We also welcome articles dealing with skepticism in any of the four language traditions, that is, Latin, Arabic, Hebrew, and Greek. Our hope is to present skepticism in the Middle Ages in a new light, and with such breadth and depth that Medieval skepticism can finally take its place in a comprehensive history of skepticism alongside Ancient and Modern.

All submitted articles should be written in English and will be subject to double blind review. To find out more about the journal and how to submit your article please go to: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/17552567